Carbineer Archive

Thread: Accuracy: curve or slope?

KenjiTokugawa
Mon Jul 19, 2004 9:59 am
#1




This is just for my idle curiousity , soI wanted to get a few opinions.


Question: If one plots the accuracy of any carbine on the graph,would it bebetter as a curve or a slope between the accuracy mods listed in the examine window?



A|

c|

c | x

u |

r |

a |

c |x

y | x

----------------------

0m 35m 64x

Range to target


Message Edited by KenjiTokugawa on 07-19-2004 10:01 AM


Edit: changed my post to correct wording. I should really get some coffee before I post in the morning


Message Edited by KenjiTokugawa on 07-19-2004 05:38 PM

Message Edited by KenjiTokugawa on 07-19-2004 05:41 PM



Jas' --- Jundland Wayfarer
"Once a Ranger, always a Ranger"


novamarine
Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:35 am
#2


That is easy enough to determine. Just target a mob and then stand at 0, 1/2 ideal and ideal, record the numbers and plot.
KenjiTokugawa
Mon Jul 19, 2004 5:40 pm
#3

I probably should have been a little clearer in my original post I actually wanted to know what carbineers think it should be, a curve ora slope.



Jas' --- Jundland Wayfarer
"Once a Ranger, always a Ranger"


AdmiralSpy
Mon Jul 19, 2004 5:56 pm
#4


Inverse Exponential curve, please!




A|

c| xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

c | x

u | x

r |x

a | x

c |x

y |x

----------------------

0m 35m 64x

Range to target

Message Edited by AdmiralSpy on 07-19-2004 08:56 PM



Addy | 'Addy
ex-Photographer
Forever Carbineer
Justuss71
Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:01 pm
#5






AdmiralSpy wrote:


Inverse Exponential curve, please!




A|

c| xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

c | x

u | x

r |x

a | x

c |x

y |x

----------------------

0m 35m 64x

Range to target

Message Edited by AdmiralSpy on 07-19-2004 08:56 PM





Amen!


However, it's obvious that accuracy works on a curve with the high point being the the ideal range of the weapon you're using.



Justuss Sophiticus
Blutzoll
Tue Jul 20, 2004 4:55 am
#6

curve of course
TAfirehawk
Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:21 am
#7






Bennyboy4308 wrote:


Neither, Its a straight line when fighting jedi.


A|

c|

c |

u |

r |

a |

c |

y |

----------------------

0m 35m 64m

Range to target
X X X





You almost had it correct, but I needed to tweak it a bit.....



Message Edited by TAfirehawk on 07-20-2004 10:05 AM



Iebas Feania
Former Correspondent of the Former Profession, CARBINEER

Rorenikibi
Tue Jul 20, 2004 7:04 am
#8






TAfirehawk wrote:





Bennyboy4308 wrote:


Neither, Its a straight line when fighting jedi.


A|

c|

c |

u |

r |

a |

c |

y |

----------------------

0m 35m 64m

Range to target
X X X





You almost had it correct, but I needed to tweak it a bit.....









Agreed, with the HAM costs, all we are doing is killing ourselves.




Captain Janu Hull CFA-7
In the event of an emergency, this pilot's ego may be used as a floatation device.


Bennyboy4308
Tue Jul 20, 2004 12:25 pm
#9


Neither, Its a straight line when fighting jedi.


A|

c|

c |

u |

r |

a |

c |

y | x xx

----------------------

0m 35m 64x

Range to target



~Enaw~ [PV/XF Da 800g3ym@n] <RebelemO FactKr>
AdmiralSpy
Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:04 pm
#10






Rorenikibi wrote:


Agreed, with the HAM costs, all we are doing is killing ourselves.




Yup yup. With Jedi involved, it's pretty much something like:




H|

A|

M|

|

B|x

a | x

r|x

s| xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

----------------------

0m 35m 64m

Range to Jedi


Of course, if you factor in /forcerun3 then we're back to TAFireHawk's altruistic analysis and diagram.


Message Edited by AdmiralSpy on 07-20-2004 11:05 PM



Addy | 'Addy
ex-Photographer
Forever Carbineer
Page 1 of 1
Previous Next