Carbineer Archive
Thread: New weapons Available: Read here vet carbineers.
Axconis wrote:
Vote 1 - Ban TA.
Reason - Providing teasers without details *pouts in the corner*
Just havin a dig folks, but please oh please do me a favour.... What i have seen of the CU (which is not really very much) already has me lathering at the mouth, stop bein such a mean nasty bully and teasin me more... Just add in thetopic "Ax don't read". On the other hand i'll send you my email address and you could be such a great person and mail me the detailsI won't tell anyone, promise.
Ugh, hope that all came out right, should be sleeping more......
TAfirehawk wrote:
Trust me, things are changing in the Combat Upgrade
Blah blah blah, things are changing blah blah blah!
/mood belligerent
/brandish
Ok buddy,we wont wait a sec! Tell us something more or my carbine will make you like a bantha poo...
Masterfish wrote:
TAfirehawk wrote:
Trust me, things are changing in the Combat Upgrade
Blah blah blah, things are changing blah blah blah!
/mood belligerent
/brandish
Ok buddy,we wont wait a sec! Tell us something more or my carbine will make you like a bantha poo...
ROFLMAO
I am a Carbineer, thus I fear no Carbines cuz I know how little they can do against the prepared target ![]()
BTW, if you haven't seen the CU info already then you sure have missed all the leaked info.....there has been a ton of leaks but I have noticed a fair % old or wrong.....so tough for non-alpha folks to know what is really happening ![]()
Message Edited by Nekra on 01-24-2005 04:34 PM
galvatronicus wrote:
Is it true we are getting that carbine that shoots lighsabers? My cousin's friend's guildmate said we were, and that it was going to be in publish 12.
That is what I told my WSing buddies would use a krayt power handler and a gorax bone feed mechanism!
forgoten wrote:
@TAfirehawk. Dude i said Read here vet carbineers your not a veteran.j/k bro, you rule, lol why you have to ruin all my fun? lol
LOL
Actually I was giving everybody the good news.....well what I CAN say at least ![]()