Carbineer Archive
Thread: whatchya got?
when i think carbine, i think the assault rifle from halo. lots of bullets, some decent damage. really more about the volume of lead in a cone area than well placed single shots. any folks out there have any insight to the strengths/weaknesses of carbines vs rifles and pistols?
Biotech, when you think of a carbine, you shouldnt think of a rifle from Halo. A carbine is, for lack of a better description, just like the U.S's Army M-1 Carbine, used in World War Two. It was mostly given to tank crews because pistols didn't have the range or power if they were attacked, and they weren't given rifles (thompsons, gerands, B.A.R's, any of these) because the size was way too bulky. This is what a carbine was, a larger pistol that had more ammo and a little more accuracy, but wasn't too bulky. A carbine shouldn't be a machine gun that you just run around, hailing fire with.
I understand not many of you would care about my refrence to WW2. To see a carbine, take the E-11 out of the Starwars movies. The stormtrooper weapon was also a carbine, as it was semi automatic, small, and easily stored. These are carbines.
carbines like M-4 have a shorter barrel then their M-16 cousins. They r used in more close quarters combat. They dont have the range of a rifle but they r more accurate, fasterand lighter. Just a tidbit the U.S. Navy SEALS use M-4 as standerd weaponry as with Isrealie armed forces. I think in generall they need to nerf pistols and add more power to both the rifle and carbines skills
The BAR wouldn't have found it's way inside a tank either because strictly speaking it's an infantry support light machine gun ( yes I know it stands for Browning Automatic Rifle ) used in the same role as the british Bren gun.
Now can we stop about correcting other people's mistake...