Carbineer Archive
Thread: Wow... i'm shocked
Page 2 of 2
TAfirehawk
Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:28 am
#14
Jaaan wrote:
Hehe,
master rifle got 90 speed, master carbiner got 60 speed.
Rifles intended to be snipers with slow but accure shots and carbines should be the assault troop with fast burst shoots. This is ridiculous.
It's okay they had to "balance" with BH, but for a non BH carbineer, who spent the same SP for the master profession as a rifleman this is a pain. With +10 (with master marksman only +5) tape, and riflemen are on speed cap with any weapon. A non BH Carbineer would need +40 for that (+35 with marksman). This is simply s*cks.
/beatdeadhorse
Chucker
Fri Nov 05, 2004 6:28 am
#15
speed wise no patch can effect me, for i have 105 carbine speed
Brainplay
Fri Nov 05, 2004 6:54 am
#16
Chucker wrote:
speed wise no patch can effect me, for i have 105 carbine speed
Thats nice, now try and help your fellow carbineers out instead of saying such "nice" comments. Yeah I'm over the cap with BH too but that doesn't mean that everyone should have to do it to get close to the speedcap.
If MIND damage and eyeshot weren't so important to PvP and jedi noob protectors I'd go full carbine....but it is unfortunatly that important. ![]()
KardenTyrell
Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:35 am
#17
Oculus wrote:
TAfirehawk wrote:
Jaaan wrote:
Hehe,
master rifle got 90 speed, master carbiner got 60 speed.
Rifles intended to be snipers with slow but accure shots and carbines should be the assault troop with fast burst shoots. This is ridiculous.
It's okay they had to "balance" with BH, but for a non BH carbineer, who spent the same SP for the master profession as a rifleman this is a pain. With +10 (with master marksman only +5) tape, and riflemen are on speed cap with any weapon. A non BH Carbineer would need +40 for that (+35 with marksman). This is simply s*cks./beatdeadhorse
It would be a dead horse if the DEVs had actually cared to comment on it and say, "Yeah, of course we always intended for rifles to fire faster than carbines". They haven't. Just ignored the issue all together because they know somebody messed up royaly in Beta ( not like we didn't mention it back then! ).
The game will be 2 years old once they fix this, pathetic,
ignored the issue? Then what do you call the combat revamp?
Oculus
Sat Nov 06, 2004 7:26 am
#18
Ignored, as in past time. Ignored as in done nothing for almost 2 years. Ignored as in never cared to comment why our speed is so low when our carbines fire as slow as they do.
ignored the issue? Then what do you call the combat revamp?
And what I call the CU? I call it something I've heard before.
Remember the Smuggler revamp? Remember GreenMarine's posts about it? He got to what? Part two, before they decided to pull the plug on community interaction in that regard.
Once the CU hits Test Center I'll believe that they've actually been woking on a CU, not another expansion.
KardenTyrell
Sat Nov 06, 2004 8:03 am
#19
Oculus wrote:Ignored, as in past time. Ignored as in done nothing for almost 2 years. Ignored as in never cared to comment why our speed is so low when our carbines fire as slow as they do.
ignored the issue? Then what do you call the combat revamp?
And what I call the CU? I call it something I've heard before.
Remember the Smuggler revamp? Remember GreenMarine's posts about it? He got to what? Part two, before they decided to pull the plug on community interaction in that regard.
Once the CU hits Test Center I'll believe that they've actually been woking on a CU, not another expansion.
it seems you're not really keeping track with devtracker and correspondant posts
Page 2 of 2