Carbineer Archive
Thread: Carb whilst moving Attachments
ZandorFelok wrote:
They are posted as one of the working CA/AA's from the galaxy trade boards. The profession skill to acc w/ moving works so the attachments work too is the only proof to back that up I guess....
AdmiralSpy wrote:
They seem to help - I haven't seen any official testing for it (as it's difficult to test), but if you can get 'em cheap, might as well
Bennyboy4308 wrote:
/hug +25 acc while moving bandioler (dont ask me how much it cost).
I know.....waaaaaay too much IMO.....
I offered about 1/4th of what you paid LOL....but I have 2 suits max'd and enough spares for 1-2 more ![]()
Bennyboy4308 wrote:
Mmm
Nice! ![]()
I myself am using a 10 speed / 10 acc Ubese Bandolier with 10 speed / 7 acc. w/ moving / 5 acc BEd shirt (stun defense) and a whole lotta +5s, 6s and +7s in armor pieces to cap out Accuracy and Acc. w/ moving as well as Counterattack.
Also sitting on a +25 speed CA, a +14 acc. AA and a +12 w/ moving AA, but I'm saving those for the CU.. as those AAs might need to be dropped in other newer armor pieces.. and I don't need the current speed.
Consider buying a whole lotta cheap +2s and +3s if need be to substitute that belt with a PSG though, heh. I unfortunately have a belt with +7 speed, +6 acc and +6 acc. w/ moving that I barely use now except for PvE.. which is a shame.. I should probably sell it (I didn't know PSGs used the belt slot when I "made" it, heh.)
Message Edited by AdmiralSpy on 11-18-2004 12:36 AM
Nadiel26 wrote:
i dont think they would make a huge impact since even with the +25 enhancer cap you wouldn't get more than +55 if that stacks with the general acc then it's a different story
Mathematically, that's almost doubling it, though. While there may be a "diminishing returns" or "minimum required" formula in place for Accuracy While Moving, it's a fair bet that:
Going from 30 to 55 is probably better than say going from 200 to 225. When mods are so low, it makes sense that nearly doubling them helps.
That is, of course, if it helps at all.. ![]()