Business And Economy Archive
Thread: Buyers and resellers beware . . .
So in short the tittle of this thread says it all.
Be Aware Of What You Are Getting Into
UmmonPrime wrote:
Giamai wrote:
basically you reported him AFTER he bent over backwards to right his own wrong and you just threw his apology in his face out of some moral self-righteousness... how obnoxious of you.
That's what I got out of this whole post.
bluejanus wrote:
UmmonPrime wrote:
Giamai wrote:basically you reported him AFTER he bent over backwards to right his own wrong and you just threw his apology in his face out of some moral self-righteousness... how obnoxious of you.
That's what I got out of this whole post.Except by that point, the seller had already defrauded a couple of people already.
As our "victim" stated, the seller made every attempt and then some to compensate the unintended targets. As for the intended ones, I don't think any reseller that can't bring him/herself to take a second and examine an item before purchasing has much of a future in the business. I can't see any reason to call in the babysitters aside from the fact that the two involved in this story don't agree on a morality issue.
What the guy did is clearly against the rules, sure. Those rules are written with a very wide scope intentionally, though. That's so SOE can fall back on them in any situation and make whatever determination they want without being bound by some poor wording because they didn't consider every dumb little situation when it was written.
Also, this isn't the real world. This is Star Wars (or supposed to be anyway). I find it amusing in a depressing kind of way that the smallest thing like this gets people worked up.
Tarallian wrote:
Giamai wrote:
at this point, with all his efforts, you actually owe him an apology imo
What exactly do I owe him an apology for? I didn't do anything wrong here, imo. I acknowledge the fact that he initiated the first email, offered a reimbursement/apology, and removed the vendor . . . of that I'm very much aware. And I do recognize the fact that he attempted to correct the situation, I'll give him credit for that.What I won't do though, is ignore the bottom line fact that what he did with the renaming of the deeds and selling them as such, was intentionally deceptive and wrong in the first place. Based on that fact, thepleased tone of a sentence inhis email in having caught some resellers too, and the short conversation I had with him via tells . . . based on those things, I decided to report him becauseI personally felt he didn't seem to see the error of his ways when it came to him renaming deeds and reselling them to trick resellers. Sure, he removed the vendor after realizing innocent bystanders could and did get caught in his trick on resellers, but what about those resellers he obvioiusly has a thing against? Did he offer them an apology as well? Did he reimburse them their credits and said I'm sorry? Will he stop his vendetta against them, or find other ways in which to trick them? I don't know the answer to any of that,but based on the points I just stated, I truly felt he hadn't learned the bottom line lesson from this incident and therefore, I decided to leave this situation in the hands of customer service to put it on record and to handle, or not, as they see fit.
Am I going to apologize for that? Of course not. Just because I'm not one of his intended victims, should I sit back, do nothingand hope that hewon't try to find other ways of tricking them, or anyone else for that matter? I'm sorry, but no, I'm just not that kind of person. I'm not angry with him, but from my experience with him I did have concern over him doing things like this again, therefore I did what I thought was right.
Emotemaster wrote:
You guys might not realize that the global bazaar is FUBARed and misnames items a LOT.
Not saying this towards the orig poster, but the guy that said about C12's
Ya that is true I think. I've seen items listed that seem to have goofed up descriptions. I think its quite likely those C12's crates could have just been the result of a vendor search bug.
Pawlin wrote:
Emotemaster wrote:
You guys might not realize that the global bazaar is FUBARed and misnames items a LOT.
Not saying this towards the orig poster, but the guy that said about C12's
Ya that is true I think. I've seen items listed that seem to have goofed up descriptions. I think its quite likely those C12's crates could have just been the result of a vendor search bug.
Yeah, the vendor search does that from time to time.
I once saw a stack of fiberplast that listed itself as water(and found in a search for water). I don't know of any way to perform that kinda naming trick with resources, but it does happen.
-Loserwan Ka'newbie
bluejanus wrote:
I don't really have a problem with resellers. Most everything I make has my name and waypointon it, so that's more publicity for me. Renaming wind harvesters as large houses is a terrible practice though.
Neither do I. If you buy my wares at the price I list, I'm happy. I don't care if you re-sell it at a higher price or not.
However, if someone goes through and buys out a lot of my product, I know I am priced to low, and will raise my prices accordingly.