Brawler Archive

Thread: give brawlers a skill to reduce armor ham costs

Melted_Igloo
Wed Aug 27, 2003 9:36 am
#1

i get the "obvious needed change for the day" award
Philomorph
Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:29 am
#2

Not a bad idea, but I'm not sure it's "obvious". I think a swordsman would generally be more encumbered by armor than a marksman, since shooting a gun doesn't requireactive dexterity and free range of motion nearly as much as brawling does. However, I do agree that armor encumbrance costs are WAY too high.


I went from Mibari to Chitin and now to Ubese and while wearing just an Ubese jacket and chitin pants, my unarmed Zabrak has action sub-stats of around 200 each. I had to migrate most of my mind pool away just to be able to wear armor, and heaven forbid I put a helmet on! I'd fall unconscious practically.




----

We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce the Complete Works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true
- Robert Wilensky
OpethRebel
Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:32 am
#3

Armor provides a HUGE benefit, it SHOULD have high costs to use.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"6 Pikeman X $15 = $90 / month" - SOE's revenue generated by pikemen.
Melted_Igloo
Wed Aug 27, 2003 2:37 pm
#4

youre right, armor shouldnt be used because of its benefit...


*pulls out greater sludge with 8k ham and 65% resist*

Page 1 of 1
Previous Next