Bounty Hunter Archive

After reading Q's response, i said now it's time for us to do something about it.

I say we go to each profession's boards and post a PLEASE FIX THE COMMANDO CLASS thread. I mean apparently we've not being heard...

When the colonists were getting shafted by the brits, they fought back...our situation is very similiar we're paying money for something that's not very worthwhile, kinda like paying taxes on tea and stamps.

Desparate time calls for desparate actions, TO ARMS BROTHERS...

Just spam it like nothing you've ever seen before. Have every post on every forum be "PLEASE FIX THE COMMANDO."

no DO NOT do that we may be having a problem but don't drag our dirty laundry onto their forums. This is our problem not theirs and we are getting enough advertisement out to everyone else as it is. We do not need to seem like rude little children by going onto the forum for their class and reposting our issues that we have very adequately stated on our own forum.

So I'm going to beg you don't follow through on this idea it only causes hatred against our class from the other classes.

I would like them to do something about our profession...but I wouldn't want to see us do that. If we go into the other boards, the other's who are sympathetic to us might decide that we're only complaining now.

Personally, I think there are professions out there which are just as broken as ours (Bio-Engineer's, Chef's, etc). And would like to see their concern's addressed as well as our own.

Lastly, I have to say that I am actually satisfied that at least we got a response from Q despite all the flaming that has been going on. I really do hope that he doesn't mean some of the things he says, but if he's only the messenger....then whomever gave him that message should take a better look at the commando.

actually if you read some of the other profession boards they point to us as an example of being effective...

The only otherboard we should we shouldbe postingon would be Gen Disc. But don't spam, use legit titles. Actually there are several a few of us started already, perhaps timely responses on those would be more appropo... Make a big push for "attention", go back and dig up all the issues we stated here and post them during business hours for them (remember: Pacific time). Not the fluff (ooooo, just thinking about the 'PistolFlurish' is making it hard for me to type again!) our REAL showstoppers. Different people at differering times in a constant din. At some point an official would say "enough!" and then we stop. Pretty much the same thing we did today, here, spontainiously.

Keep the terrain negotiation. Make it to where every one who has it burst run efficeant at a lower cost.

melee and ranged defence. make it work

Add in melee and ranged accuracy while moving and speed bonus.

make it to where every one in the game can only have a max of 5 ppl in a group. novice SL 10 and have a progression to where master can have up to 20 ppl in group.

Orgive Sq leaders the ability to group with another group that has a sq leader while working indepentantly with his own group. Making for mass formation or battle stratagies.

well I had more ideas but my 1 year old had deleted it by hitting my key board. but if I have more i will repost on this thread.. Well any way would love some commentary on what every one thinks.

Well really you have two options.

One; if you are in PvE then the other SL just needs to use thier other skills.

Two; If you are in PvP then in most cases you should form two or more groups with each leading one.

I saw someone bring up the issue of multiple squad leaders. What about this. Every additional squad leader in the group reduces the ham cost of SL abilities being used by the leader. Also a quarter( or something else small) of the leadership experience is divided amongst the additional SL's in the group. The presence of others in the SL profession should make it easier for the leader SL to communicate his/her orders to the group.

true

I believe as a Squad "Leader" you should really only have one person "leading"

.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................right