Bounty Hunter Archive
Thread: Mustafar : the 2nd Jedi Haven?
I doubt they will. We'll probably get a message similar to the following:
"Due to the extremeley volitile state of Mustafar, your probe droid's signal was lost in the electronmagnetic interference"
They're making it around the same as Kashyyyk, but no instanced zones (?) I think. Its a quest-driven planet, so theres no need for endless kilometers of creatures and terrain.
TheZabrakMaul wrote:
Give us real 225 sq km planets like the original planets, please Devs.....
Yeah, it sucks....but allow them to play once in a while too
it is a priviledge that we are even allowed to kill jedi, we are the only profession that can do that.
And btw, don't complain before it is a fact, there is a chance that it won't be jedi heaven.
mohtz1 wrote:
they already said mustafar will be set up like the orginal planets but not as big..the reason why droids dont work on wookie world is because of all the zones on it..with that in mind our droids should work on mustafar without a problem..
Message Edited by Aendracon on 09-02-2005 06:37 AM
Droids did not give the BS "due to high concentration of life blah blah" about the first 3-4 days of Kash being live. You got WP, droids somewhat updated, they where very buggy and borked, which IS why we have the droid message we have now. They had to backpeddle on it.
Aendracon wrote:
mohtz1 wrote:
they already said mustafar will be set up like the orginal planets but not as big..the reason why droids dont work on wookie world is because of all the zones on it..with that in mind our droids should work on mustafar without a problem..
Yep, they said somewhere (HoC-chat?) that Mustafar will be non-instanced, but smaller than the old planets. As for the droids, not sure if this was the real reason for it. IMO, it was an attempt to separate the prey from the hunter. With the new limitations to player hunting, that should be obsolete, but there is no way to tell to which extend SoE will go to cater to the Jedi. Not that I care, really. I hope its such a good time for Jedi that they all go there and stay there.
Message Edited by Aendracon on 09-02-2005 06:37 AM
CivicBountyHunter wrote:
Droids did not give the BS "due to high concentration of life blah blah" about the first 3-4 days of Kash being live. You got WP, droids somewhat updated, they where very buggy and borked, which IS why we have the droid message we have now. They had to backpeddle on it.
Aendracon wrote:
mohtz1 wrote:
they already said mustafar will be set up like the orginal planets but not as big..the reason why droids dont work on wookie world is because of all the zones on it..with that in mind our droids should work on mustafar without a problem..
Yep, they said somewhere (HoC-chat?) that Mustafar will be non-instanced, but smaller than the old planets. As for the droids, not sure if this was the real reason for it. IMO, it was an attempt to separate the prey from the hunter. With the new limitations to player hunting, that should be obsolete, but there is no way to tell to which extend SoE will go to cater to the Jedi. Not that I care, really. I hope its such a good time for Jedi that they all go there and stay there.Message Edited by Aendracon on 09-02-2005 06:37 AM
Yes they didn't try to solve the errors that occured with the droids reporting. This effects everyone not just BHs. If have ever tried to create a waypoint in game from a waypoint given on the forums that spot, if it is in an instance could be over 5km away. Trying to follow a guide for a quest is alot harder on Kash than on a normal planet.
Did Kash given become a haven, yes it did. However, for a Jedi to grind there isn't the best way. A spin group on any planet creates more xp than Kash minus the bugs and exploits.
thats no true, if you are overt and the jedi of an opposite faction is overt you can kill them too, only bh can kill them when ever they feel like.
MetalReaper wrote:
it is a priviledge that we are even allowed to kill jedi, we are the only profession that can do that.
And it is our privelege to do so....
and our responsibility to do so as often as we can