Bio Engineer Archive
Thread: Tamed Razor Cat
droid327 wrote:
well im a reb so i cant do the imp themepark for them, if thats what you meant. Spent a few hours with the NH today though, quite tasty DNA =)Like it better than trying to get stun/intim to come through from 2 different DNA slots or trying to breed out Rancors on my multigen nonch pets....here's what I found:
NH doesnt work in VD VD HP HPX recipe...no experiment bumps it up to CL11, max experiment CL13. Maybe someone would try with the tamed razor cat and no experiment and seeif we cant trumpthe Sevorrt for slot X in our favorite 'legit' recipe =)
NH does work nicely in MH MH CBD CBD NH....no experiment gives you CL 15, max experiment gives CL15, but max phys with a box of prow and mental gives you CL12 (for you CL-formula speculating nuts hehe)
With 4xCL15 and 1xCL12 1st-gen DNA, max physique 1 box prow men gave me a nice CL10 with about 9k5k3k, 50 Kin vuln rest, 150-160 with stun/intim and ranged.
Using 5xCL15 1st-gen gave CL11with no experiment and CL13 with max experiment, so you'll have to do at least one Gen-1 with the CL12 method.
Message Edited by fotabett on 12-04-2004 04:48 AM
fotabett wrote:
Color coded for the psychodelic in me: wear shades if you are color sensitive.
Does max experimentation mean you used all 10 points? (I assume all10 points were used in physique, prow and mental, but I don't want to assume).
Interesting as always; but are you able to constantly get CL12 with max physique (3,4 or 5) and 1 prow and 1 ment? note: each experimentation attempt effects 2 attributes and the great success is an average of the 2 attributes whether it be AS & S or GS & GS.
Are these CL15 the no experimentation or the max experimentation?
yes, all 10 points. Max physique, then prowess, then mental, but I think I was able to max all 3 with 10 points
Actually I only ran 1 of each type since Ididnt have enough NH DNA to do another set, but the 3 point difference is significant enough IMO to reflect the process more than individual DNA fluctuations. I tried to keep the stats similar on all the templates; I always paired the higher hardiness samples with the lower hardiness samples in slot 1 and 2 to keep average H balanced, and always used VHQ in slot 5 with HQ in 3 and 4, or HQ in 5 with AA in 3 and 4. Also, at MBE, you're getting good or amazing successes each time, so both stats are going up consistently. You dont really have to deal with the "one goes up and one goes down but overall its up so it says a success" problem at high levels in BE. So I'm confident that a repetition of the process will yield similar enough results.
I mixed them in, actually. I used the max-ex for slot 1 and 2, since they of course had the higher hardiness, and the no-ex for 3 and 4 since they had the lower hardiness, with the CL12 in slot 5. If you're wondering, the max-ex samples ended up in the 490s-500s for hardiness, the no-ex in the 330s-340s, and the CL12in the 490s. Still, using all max-ex shouldnt affect much since slot 3 and 4 only affect H by 10%.