Bio Engineer Archive
Thread: Is it possible . . .
HayabusaN wrote:
Is it possible to create a 100% blast NON-CH pet?
no it's clearlynot. In fact it would be very difficult to make one at any level that had 100% blast
Is it possible to create a 100% stun NON-CH pet?
this is not completely out of the realm of possibility. It may be possible but it would be a heroic task, and the resulting creature I'm betting would be extremely gimped in terms of all other stats (HAM and damage in particular). Let's call this one extremely unlikely rather than impossible.
Message Edited by ArthurDentOnBria on 12-10-2004 03:04 PM
It was for NS tanking (just for NS with stan baton of course), but as they also use force attacks, it requires some healing.
Tytan wrote:
It was easier than I thought and took me about 3 or 4 generations I think.
Oh cool! I'll take 10 of em ![]()
I'll just re-iterate my "it would be a heroic task" statement, lol.
Message Edited by ArthurDentOnBria on 12-10-2004 03:15 PM
HayabusaN wrote:Is it possible to create a 100% blast NON-CH pet?Is it possible to create a 100% stun NON-CH pet?
The problem with 100% resists is that you need each sample to stay at 100% in order for it to keep going. The only critter with 100% resistance to blast is the insane mantigrue berserker which has a lot of other resists as well. Too many in fact for it to ever drop below level 10 and become a non-CH pet.
As others mentioned, it's easier with stun because of the tortur bull but still not very easy. I personally wouldn't build one for less than seven figures.
Hmm, a NS tank in a durni skin...
HayabusaN wrote:
/bump
I don't understand. Why bump a message that is already on the first page near the stickies? It had only been a few hours since the last post in the thread, which in this relatively low-traffic forum is really no time at all. And why consider bumping the message at all after Arthur gave you such a complete reply?
I'm not complaining about it, but I really am curious what you were hoping for. If you were hoping for more information, then perhaps another question would get you better results. Again, I'm not complaining, but just trying to determine how we can best help you.
Message Edited by Hylidex on 12-11-2004 11:48 AM