Bio Engineer Archive
Thread: What do we want in a correspondent?
I look for someone who can boil down the fat and get to the root-cause of an issue in 10 words or less.
No need for a fancy debater. It's better to have a correspondant who can listen and objectively and IMPARTIALLY take the sides of an issue (often more than two sides) and list the pros and cons in a non-inflammatory manner.
The better this person is at boiling down the fat and listing the real issue in a consice manner, the better it will be to have the developers actually take notice.
A developer is typically going to SCAN through 100 issues and attempt to rank them in some sort of priority - based on easy of fix, seriousness of the problem, etc.
First off I would like to say that who ever does end up with the Correspondent job will get no envy from this fish ![]()
I have been fairly involved, in the past, with the CH community. Just as a regular ol' poster I found it incredibly frustrating dealing with the complete idiotism of TH when it came to the CH profession.
Statements were made by him on a regular bases, back in the December/post December CH nerf and then again with the "calling pet in the wild timer", that made me seriously question if the DEVs/SOE reps ignore their correspondents as much as they ignore the rest of us.
Add that in with the fact that not only is a Correspondent **paying** SOE to play their game they are offering a time intensive commitment to SOE with no reimburseement what-so-ever... Sort of like paying a cover charge to get into a club only to volunteer your time to driving the drunks home who have been having fun partying all night long ![]()
Anyhow, as far as who I want as the new BE correspondent:
- Someone who has been an active member here at the forums and has taken the time to post guides, FAQs, creature recipes, etc etc etc
- someone who has taken the time to help others on a semi-regular bases answering newbie questions
- someone has an understanding of math and an ability to use excel

- someone that can listen to others and take into account their position even if they dont agree with them
- someone who doesnt let criticism get personal
- most importantly, someone who has the time to invest into a profession that will likely not get another serious look by the DEVs for some time.
Personally I dont see how anyone would want that job
I have already stated in a previous thread my top 3 picks was ArthurDentonBria, NancyJ, and Tal-N. Because of Tal-N's RL circumstances I narrowed that down to Arthur and Nancy... Because of Nancy wanting to try another profession I narrowed it down to Arthur... However, aftering hearing what Nancy said on that topic in her thread she made to announce her bid, I would nowre-widen my choices back to Arthur and Nancy.
Personally I would like to see one of them get it. Most of us know those two as active and helpful posters who have shown their love and patience for this profession. To know that a familiar face is working on our behalf would be a comfort to someone like me who knows we are likely in for a rocky road of DEV ignorment ![]()
Having said that, I personally would keep an open mind to others that apply... However, in the end, it is up to TH to make that decision and I highly doubt, even while he posted to the contrary, that much weight will be given to what the average Joe in here has to say.
Call me a cynic if you like but I perfer to refer to myself as a realist ![]()
Message Edited by SomeUser on 05-06-2004 02:37 PM