Bio Engineer Archive
Thread: My latest batch of Non-CH rocked.
Yes it's a different version but that doesn't mean that everything is going in at once, after just copying a database they'd upload a semi-patched version to ensure it's stable before then going and throwing everything in. Also we don't know what the TC2 is being set up for, it might not be intended to contain the same build as the normal TC. The fact they copied a server's database sounds more like stress testing something than the usual debugging.
quote:
Also, where specifically have the Devs said that that was the max? Was that 2k-3k with 20% resists across the boards? With ranged attack? With Stun and Energy as Vulnerables? Or was it only with an Attack Speed of less that 2.0????
My point is that they haven't told us squat!! Who is to say that an animal can't be CL10 when it has 6k/2k/3k ham and all but two resists are vulnerables? (The Devs could if they would define the system for us.....but that isn't going to happen) One has to realize that HAM isn't the only thing taken into account with the CL level now (IE Patch 6). Resists play a big part in determining the CL too. I still have to determine is specials play any part (but getting them in the appropriate dna is limiting things).
Lets not cry foul until the play is made. It might be that the DEVs have finally given their say (Though we will never hear it)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. there is no such cl 10 pet that has more than 900 ham, 6-8k ham thats cl 10 will be invailed you can bet on that too
Albion_DeCrappa wrote:I'm standing on TC-Bria with my 5.8k health, 3.5 action, 2.3k mind 16% kenetic lvl 10 pet AND HE'S VALID.You are very right, I have a CL5 Kima that is 9k HAM and he is valid. This is because the "fix" for invalid pets is not going in until publish 6. It was put in and then removed because there were still some problems with it. But supposedly there were changes make the code so that we can no longer make invalid pets, but many of the posts I am seeing prove this to be wrong also.
You missed what he said, or didn't know something..... He is on the TEST CENTER - Bria. The Devs duplicated Bria on test center 2 and added Patch 6. So infact he was using patch 6 and was able to call them.
Rock-o (wanderhome)
Albion_DeCrappa wrote:The Devs have made it pretty clear that NON-CH pets should not be above 2k - 3k HAM.
Also, where specifically have the Devs said that that was the max? Was that 2k-3k with 20% resists across the boards? With ranged attack? With Stun and Energy as Vulnerables? Or was it only with an Attack Speed of less that 2.0????
My point is that they haven't told us squat!! Who is to say that an animal can't be CL10 when it has 6k/2k/3k ham and all but two resists are vulnerables? (The Devs could if they would define the system for us.....but that isn't going to happen) One has to realize that HAM isn't the only thing taken into account with the CL level now (IE Patch 6). Resists play a big part in determining the CL too. I still have to determine is specials play any part (but getting them in the appropriate dna is limiting things).
Lets not cry foul until the play is made. It might be that the DEVs have finally given their say (Though we will never hear it)
Rock-o Castlebane (wanderhome)
Psst.. not everyone is American.
DougNichols wrote:
Tarnblade wrote:
You do realise you come across as a little kid
Because I disagree with Tal-N's view of what should and should not be adjusted on the live servers? By the way, it's realize, not realise.
Nice pet.
I'm certain vulns reduce level. I'm surprised you were able to take it to such an extreme, but not surprised by the trend.
I don't know what will be legit. It is very possible the 3.5K Health things I've been making will also be considered too high.
The problem is more fundemental than these particular pets - pet decay is too slow. They shouldn't even be worrying about adjusting existing pets. They should have a system in place so that in 4-6 weeks of use, the pet is too beat up to be combat worthy, and this nonsense goes away. And our profession gets more repeat business. Right now, I don't know of any pet which has been put to pasture because of combat abuse.