Bio Engineer Archive

so did she get banned?

I respect dorelli - and have recieved help from her on these forums and find this post is a reflection of the sort of people you sometimes find in the game. I find to have any sort of life in swg you need to have one in real life this guy seems to lack both, having lost reality in both worlds.

LOL, you shouldn't be banned.

Ni should get his customers to post the stats of his creations after theyhave beentamed and have reached maturity. If the stats remain the same as onhis deedthen we obviously don't know what we are doing. Of course, if they haven't adjusted to CL then isn't that an exploit?

i've asked for testimony before.

he has posted the names of previous customers, but none have responded, as of yet.

Sorry I'm still here. Just cataloguing all the DNA on tatooine with my new novice BE so I didn't have anything 'portant to say

Thank you all,
Dor

---

lammergeier wrote:

---

Whirr wrote:

---

ZenLhaso wrote:

Somebody please correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't PM mean "Private Message"?

P r i v a t e - not public.

---

Private? On the Internet? If you don't want others to read what you write don't bother writing it.

---

there is no expectation of privacy in logged online communication, legally or morally.

personally, as correspondent and beta tester, there are certain LEGAL agreements I've accepted concerning NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) issues... but these are seperate, and standard. I've been given 'priveledged access' to certain information, and with that comes a certain legal responsibility. I can't tell you that I know certain things, and if I could, I couldn't tell you what they are. or aren't.

dorelli has been an asset to the profession during our troubled times, and she has gone out of her way to organize, interact with, and inform the SWG community.

if she is being harrassed in PM's, then she has every right to post the offense. we can't validate the content of the PM's she posts, but we can all decide for ourselves if she is accurately portraying the PM's she's gotten... that she edited the offensive parts tends to add credibility to her communications here in public. that she's been a solid, determined, selfless poster on these forums does more.

dorelli's only possible infraction, whether moral, civil, or criminal, was to post INFORMATIVELY in another player's 'trade' thread. trade threads are... questionable. it is generally frowned upon to post negatively in a trade thread... except that the thread in question makes dubious claims, provides erroneous information, and generally serves a less than reputable ingame service.

I stand behind any active member of the BioE forums who works to improve the profession. I do NOT appreciate players who overstate, misuse, or abuse the profession for personal profit.

---

Shame there isn't a 5* button anymore...

~Here you go Lam...
*****

---

LloydPickering wrote:

---

lammergeier wrote:

---

Whirr wrote:

---

ZenLhaso wrote:

Somebody please correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't PM mean "Private Message"?

P r i v a t e - not public.

---

Private? On the Internet? If you don't want others to read what you write don't bother writing it.

---

there is no expectation of privacy in logged online communication, legally or morally.

personally, as correspondent and beta tester, there are certain LEGAL agreements I've accepted concerning NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) issues... but these are seperate, and standard. I've been given 'priveledged access' to certain information, and with that comes a certain legal responsibility. I can't tell you that I know certain things, and if I could, I couldn't tell you what they are. or aren't.

dorelli has been an asset to the profession during our troubled times, and she has gone out of her way to organize, interact with, and inform the SWG community.

if she is being harrassed in PM's, then she has every right to post the offense. we can't validate the content of the PM's she posts, but we can all decide for ourselves if she is accurately portraying the PM's she's gotten... that she edited the offensive parts tends to add credibility to her communications here in public. that she's been a solid, determined, selfless poster on these forums does more.

dorelli's only possible infraction, whether moral, civil, or criminal, was to post INFORMATIVELY in another player's 'trade' thread. trade threads are... questionable. it is generally frowned upon to post negatively in a trade thread... except that the thread in question makes dubious claims, provides erroneous information, and generally serves a less than reputable ingame service.

I stand behind any active member of the BioE forums who works to improve the profession. I do NOT appreciate players who overstate, misuse, or abuse the profession for personal profit.

---

Shame there isn't a 5* button anymore...

~Here you go Lam...
*****

---

Lammergier - thank you. Everyone who was supportive - thank you. Everyone who pointed out that I might have been out of line - thank you as well.

Can we possibly pretend this never was posted now? (I still don't think it was very nice of me to post his PM's) ...

<lock thread now please? someone???>

---

Whirr wrote:

---

ZenLhaso wrote:

Somebody please correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't PM mean "Private Message"?

P r i v a t e - not public.

---

Private? On the Internet? If you don't want others to read what you write don't bother writing it.

---

there is no expectation of privacy in logged online communication, legally or morally.

personally, as correspondent and beta tester, there are certain LEGAL agreements I've accepted concerning NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) issues... but these are seperate, and standard. I've been given 'priveledged access' to certain information, and with that comes a certain legal responsibility. I can't tell you that I know certain things, and if I could, I couldn't tell you what they are. or aren't.

dorelli has been an asset to the profession during our troubled times, and she has gone out of her way to organize, interact with, and inform the SWG community.

if she is being harrassed in PM's, then she has every right to post the offense. we can't validate the content of the PM's she posts, but we can all decide for ourselves if she is accurately portraying the PM's she's gotten... that she edited the offensive parts tends to add credibility to her communications here in public. that she's been a solid, determined, selfless poster on these forums does more.

dorelli's only possible infraction, whether moral, civil, or criminal, was to post INFORMATIVELY in another player's 'trade' thread. trade threads are... questionable. it is generally frowned upon to post negatively in a trade thread... except that the thread in question makes dubious claims, provides erroneous information, and generally serves a less than reputable ingame service.

I stand behind any active member of the BioE forums who works to improve the profession. I do NOT appreciate players who overstate, misuse, or abuse the profession for personal profit.