Armorsmith Archive
Thread: CALL FOR LIGHTSABRE RESIST FUNCTIONALITY EVIDENCE
Page 1 of 1
padan-fain
Wed Jun 30, 2004 4:04 am
#1
Has anyone been able to test the transient lightsabre resists tantel armour and PSG's have displayed? As you may know these resists "decay" after you've logged out and may or may not be ghost resists when displayed, i.e. have no effect.
Please provide some evidence if possible. Thunderheart once said, so i've been informed, that no one should be able to "cut swaths" through crowds of people. Lightsabre damage seems to be able to do just that. Tho in defence of jedi they seem quite good "swath cutters" in Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones.
Even tho tantel is only light AR and PSG's none AR (and LS are medium AP (?)) and ~20-30% resist it still would reduce damage. If i remember correctly as vulnerable armour counts as AR none anyway. Therefore comp armour users take 150% ( 2 AP steps, bonus 50% dam, no resist) damage, tantel with 25% resist would suffer ~94% ( bonus 25%, reduce 125% by 25%) and PSG's with say 45% suffer ~ 80% ( 2 bonus AP steps 150% total reduced by 45% ).
So any evidence of this type of combat spam data?
Please provide some evidence if possible. Thunderheart once said, so i've been informed, that no one should be able to "cut swaths" through crowds of people. Lightsabre damage seems to be able to do just that. Tho in defence of jedi they seem quite good "swath cutters" in Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones.
Even tho tantel is only light AR and PSG's none AR (and LS are medium AP (?)) and ~20-30% resist it still would reduce damage. If i remember correctly as vulnerable armour counts as AR none anyway. Therefore comp armour users take 150% ( 2 AP steps, bonus 50% dam, no resist) damage, tantel with 25% resist would suffer ~94% ( bonus 25%, reduce 125% by 25%) and PSG's with say 45% suffer ~ 80% ( 2 bonus AP steps 150% total reduced by 45% ).
So any evidence of this type of combat spam data?
Page 1 of 1