Armorsmith Archive
Thread: I am taking odds....
Page 2 of 2
Fellstaff
Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:53 pm
#14
At this point you can't be 'anti-CU'. If you are, you might as well just leave because the CU isn't going away, and stomping of feet and gnashing of teeth won't stop them from making the crafting changes. The best you can do is be pro-SWG and work to make this new system the best for the players.
Blimigerite wrote:
Fellstaff wrote:
ZionHalcyon wrote:
....that the devs do not name a new corrospondant until after the CURB goes live.
Odds are currently 3-1.
Anyone want to bet against me?
I bet they do, but I'm betting they'll name someone that isn't an armorsmith currently.
That's one of the major qualifications to being a correspondent is to at least know the profession.
Whomever gets picked I bet they wrote a pro-CU application
NiBorg
Tue Apr 19, 2005 9:02 pm
#15
I am pro SWG, but not pro EQ2 with an SWG skin. I've said my peace on how I feel.
Click the PA link, you know you want to. 
Fellstaff
Tue Apr 19, 2005 9:21 pm
#16
NiBorg wrote:
I am pro SWG, but not pro EQ2 with an SWG skin. I've said my peace on how I feel.
Click the PA link, you know you want to.
Never played EQ2, I've been playing SWG with a little KoTOR I/II on the side. But I've also been playing online games for 7 years now. UO, Jumpgate, Anarchy Online, Shattered Galaxy, DAoC, SWG.. and those are just the games I paid for. Every single one had balance issues. Jumpgate - 2+ years beta, still wasn't balanced, Shattered Galaxy, they added more content after release, took alot to balance. Anarchy Online, short dev cycle (like SWG), released with lots of unresolved issues. DAoC, lots of issues after release.
Page 2 of 2