Architect Archive

Thread: Low Grade Ore Density

Swamp_Dredd
Wed Aug 06, 2003 11:31 pm
#1

Is it true that low grade ore will never be more dense then 60% I have seen this several places and wanted to confirm. I know I personally have never found it at more then 60%.



Any thoughts?



Adune
Wed Aug 06, 2003 11:43 pm
#2

I've had 2 different ores at 72 max.




Adune, Master Armorsmith
ARR Armor, Strongbadia, Naboo
Waste93
Thu Aug 07, 2003 1:09 am
#3

I've seen a high 70's. Think it was 78% of carbonite.



Colonel Waste - The Wookiee Crusader
Creadux
Thu Aug 07, 2003 5:38 am
#4

Well typically you don't see LG ore over 60-70% you don't see it much below 20% anywhere on a given planet it might be on. It seems that Ore's more or less cover a planet in some abundance but not one given high concentration.
JazzmanianDevil
Thu Aug 07, 2003 6:10 am
#5

The last good low grade ore vein we had on Talus spiked to 80% in one spot. I was sad to see it go. Nothing but garbage at the moment. I dont' waste maintenance money putting harvesters on spots that are under 50%



lilililililililililililililililililililililililililililililililililililililililililililil
Jakyle Lv'Taryl
Retired and soon to be deleted Master Architect
Disgruntled Bothan Rebel Pistoleer
In the player built village of Twinloch, on Talus, Tarquinas server
Shop location, SW of Dearic at Neg 1110 by Neg 5015

no_bargain
Thu Aug 07, 2003 6:17 am
#6


I had a 77 last resource shift on eclipse.. but it was in the mountains and the only thing that could be placed was personals.. heh.


Highest I've ever seen was 78.





Aeko - Eclipse
Master Architect... Retired. Now selling odds and ends.
Vendors at 5780 6939 near kaadara on Naboo, 500m from starport.
RovaniDragon
Thu Aug 07, 2003 7:03 am
#7

personally i think this and solar/wind power deposits need to be addresses.

The ore is just another way to nerf architechs because they know darn well we need the 4 billion tons of it just to do anything.

As for the wind/solar issue, whats the point of having more efficient harvesters when they keep the density low enough it balances out with other harvesters on a higher density spot?

All resources should have the ability to go higher than 60/70 more consistantly than it currently is.
Airlik
Thu Aug 07, 2003 7:23 am
#8

I haven't had the pleasure of being able to afford interplanetary harvesting yet, but I'd like to think places like Tatooine would have quite high solar concentrations? If so it would be worth it to fly there, drop a couple solar generators and come back a week later to scoop up the loads of energy.


I also have yet to find ore deposits higher than 38% this 'cycle'... Anyone know where I can find one of those web sites I hear about where people post the waypoints for high resource concentrations for each server/planet/resource? Sometimes I'll run out to my lone harvester in a vast field sitting on a 94% chemical deposit and I'm thinking, "I really should share this info", and other times I've got my ore harvester crowded in on the edge of a field full of harvesters scraping up a 35% concentration and I'm thinking, "There has GOT to be a better place but I can't find it".




-----
Kauri - Airlik - M. Artisan, M. Weaponsmith, M. Merchant
Bloodfin - Airlik - M. Scout, M. Marksman, M. CH, 0-0-1-1 BH
Lowca - Osskoska - TKM
JZ_Combo
Thu Aug 07, 2003 7:27 am
#9

I found 68% on Tatooine last night...



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=========================================================
SWG: Chilastra - Novice Architect - 6000xp from Novice Merchant
Goals: Master Architect; Master Droid Engineer; Master Merchant
Collector's Edition SWG - $75; SWG Prima Guide - $25; Play Game - $15/month;
"Now connecting to the Galaxy" - Priceless...
Savage1
Thu Aug 07, 2003 9:31 am
#10

highest ive seen anywhere on starsider was 71% before the resource RESET. OUr shifts werent qworking so they wiped em all out and started over last week. Now, cant find anything higher then 66% anywhere, and thats in the middle of a huge lake hehe. 65% was the best i could build on, and theres no room for anyone else nearby soo..


Other then that usually 50% is considered "Good" 70% is "great" and anything higher then that is amazing.


-Broote

Tuzmin
Thu Aug 07, 2003 12:26 pm
#11

Most I've seen personally is 66%, I've seen 98% chemical. This makes me sad.



~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^

I am the only one worthy of being a community member.


Page 1 of 1
Previous Next