Architect Archive
Thread: please bump for a dev to read
Page 1 of 1
bloudhunter
Fri Mar 05, 2004 10:51 am
#1
i would like to know why balancing means nurfing something, instead of nurfing something that is cool the way it is, why dont they try to make everything else a little better. im surprised everything in this game doesn't suck. it just seems to me eveytime there is something alot of people like something they make it crap, thus forcing everyone to find something else. why not make everything good instead of making everything crap.
so take TK or COMMANDO both are pretty decent in combat so that just tells me that sony will nurf them and they will suck, instead of doing that why not give some of the other classes a new special attack to make them a more viable combat class.
IF YOU TAKE AWAY EVERYTHING FUN EVERYONE WILL EVENTUALLY QUIT.
i know this isnt the best board for this post but it seems to be viewed alot. so every one post your opinion here good or bad and maybee a dev will read it.
bloudhunter
Fri Mar 05, 2004 10:55 am
#2
how did i get on the architeck boards??? i dint mean to post this here but i cant seem to edit it....moderators feel free to move to a differnt board
Leana_Txorana
Fri Mar 05, 2004 2:02 pm
#3
The reason they sometimes need to lower the power/utility is long term balance. They could raise other things instead but that would lead to a number of issues.
1) T21 found to be over-powered, raise EVERY other weapon to make them scale properly.
2) Then the creatures need to be scaled.
Three months down the road, Dwarf Nuna have 100,000 HAM but CDEF Pistols are doing 1000-1500 damage.
bloudhunter
Fri Mar 05, 2004 4:07 pm
#4
i see your point, and i do agree but seems they over do it sometimes
Page 1 of 1