Architect Archive

Actually, from what I've seen, he has you pegged *exactly* - you are angry with how someone else plays the game and you hold up the "fair" banner. You haven't responded to which of all the ways players operate you consider "fair" and "unfair" with *any* form of logic to back you up.

And BTW - just because you say something endlessly and loudly doesn't really make it so - you have to back it up with some thought.

Chilastra: Mikka R'zrPoint, Spy (Master Ranger/Master Pistoleer)
Chilastra: Zalle RazorPoint, Trader:Engineer (Master Architect, Master DE, Master Shipwright) - vendors just north of Theed at -3858 6181
Test Center: Rikka R'zrPoint, Master Artisan, Master Architect - showroom just south of Theed at -5370, 3139

---

ZenDragonMLSwrote:

You haven't responded to which of all the ways players operate you consider "fair" and "unfair" with *any* form of logic to back you

So yes: SINGLE ADMIN and FORCE REDEEDING - I'll keep on saying it again and again and again until Devs fix it

---

So by your definition of fair play, then the people who are part of a guild who share lots to mine/hold factories/store houses, etc also have an unfair advantage over those who aren't in PAs by choice (I mean, according to your logic, they should not be "forced" into a PA to compete against those in a PA as that would be unfair). Also by extension you could argue that allowing players to have multiple accounts in the game is also against the concept of "fair play" as again, it allows them resources that are not available to the single account holder - even though those people have the financial resources to hold and pay for multiple accounts! But could you argue that the "fair-play" issue doesn't extend to this level?

Now you could probably have one and not the other, disallow lot sharing between servers and even between intra-server buddies, but to call it in the name of "fair play" means that everyone is treated evenly; ie, disallow all inter-server lot sharing, disallow intra-server lot sharing and disallow multi-account holders. But then this wouldnt be fair to those who tip more moeny into the game than single account holders.

So where do you draw the line as to what is fair and what is not?

I mean, at the end of the day, your perception of fairness will differ to my perception of fairness which will differ to someone elses level of fairness and so on and so on.

And a final note, I think that its appalling that you have felt the need to hijack what is a very worthy posting by a dedicated architect who is trying to help those who are in a position of wanting to make it as a solo architect, or who are starting off in the profession. Your nefarious position in dragging external debates into what isa posting aimed at helping and assisting people deserves is to be looked on in shame. And to have left your incendiary comments unanswered would amount to silent agreement,something thatneither I, some others, nor the original poster couldleave without an answeringcomment.