Architect Archive
Thread: BACKPACK NERF Dont you love those whining Merchants....
Ferrer_Roberts wrote:
My post was to inform the users of this forumGrisbilen so your "one star" was a bit petty...........
Unless of course you have just confirmed what the thread title says lol.
Thanks for all your input eveyone else.
Ferrer
MArch
Infinity
Your thread title was uncalled for, innacurate and designed in a way to be insulting. But you call a one-star petty?
::::scratches head:::::
Ferrer_Roberts wrote:
Your thread title was uncalled for, innacurate and designed in a way to be insulting. But you call a one-star petty?
.............................................................................................
Yes I do and thats my opinion as the above is yours.
A one star for thread title....whats this the new Merchant Thought Police.......lol
A small look in the merchant forum is enough to notice how most posters there are one line whiners or even worse whole paragraph gloaters over the upcomming vendor/merchant nerf.
If you dont like the view others have of your forum get posting and one staring there.
Im sure the rest of the crafting forums are actually full of love for the merchants who are supporting nerf after nerf.
Ferrer
MArch
Infinity
Are you for real or just being a useless troll? Show me one post where Merchants were asking for the Backpack nerf prior to it happening. It was never asked for - never. Your accusation has no grounds or merit. It's not even a bloody opinion because it would have to have some semblence of truth for you to form an opinion on in the first place.
Allow me to generalize as freely as you are. From the small posts you've made, you're a ... clueless whiner - the worst kind.
Pawlin wrote:
And yes it is a storage nerf for anyone using vendors as storage which they were not intended for.
I actually find this statement to be hilarious. The devs have never come out and told us what ANYTHING was intended for. We all are playing this game by the seat of our pants, and making up game content as we go.People keeptalking as if there was some grand scheme that we are all gravitating to because of its simple genius. What things are intended for? You've got to be kidding!!!
If anyone had seriously looked at the ramifications of our overly complicated and convoluted system of resources and shifts, then they would never have set up a database which cannot be expanded. On top of that, though, it seems that the precious database space needs to be conserved for the greater loot drops and variety that the combat professions keep getting. This game was supposed to have content for crafters and combatants, and that is not the way it is turning out.
I thought at first the game was INTENDED to be fully enjoyed by all types of players, but now I wonder if anything at all was really intended. I am tending to believe that nearly everything that we consider content and immersion is just simply accident and misinterpretation of whatever is in the devs' little pointed heads (or, at the very least, in the devs' managers' little pointed heads).
The optimist says that the game is working as intended. The pessimist is afraid that the optimist is right.
LadyGrey wrote:
Pawlin wrote:
And yes it is a storage nerf for anyone using vendors as storage which they were not intended for.
I actually find this statement to be hilarious. The devs have never come out and told us what ANYTHING was intended for. We all are playing this game by the seat of our pants, and making up game content as we go.People keeptalking as if there was some grand scheme that we are all gravitating to because of its simple genius. What things are intended for? You've got to be kidding!!!
...
No I'm not kidding.
The DEVs do state on the rare occasion how things are intended to work.Granted it is rare and a random post in the forums rather than proper straight forward documentation, but they DO say how they intend for things to work ... sometimes.
And I honestly think it is pretty blatantlyobvious that vendors are not intended for storage. So in this case I do not need someone with a redname to say so explicitly for me to state it with confidence as a fact rather than my interpretation of some imagined vagueness in the game.