Politician Archive
Thread: Devs! Jaspor Chooses to Cheat
Was GRIEFING and SIEGEING intended ?
where do SIEGEING and GRIEFING fit in real democracies ? where do they fit in DICTATORSHIPS ?
there is no need to be player of the game to judge that the SIEGERS are RIPPING of other people's work, citing that "hey we were 80 people they were 10 ppl they got a city we havent so we are right to RIP OFF them of their labour"... you know what this is called in real world ? MINORITY OPRESSION.
which is something as bad as barring citizens from voting. the guilty party here is the opressor, the agressor, dammit, the SIEGER.
Griefing? No...so that is why the / command will be removed. Seiging? yes CoC are the opressors there are more people currently in the city that wish to oust him as mayor, but he wishes to make it so they cannot. By using the / command or any of the other myriad of suggestions made. Maybe his off server contacts will come through for him and then he'll have some nice dummy votes to swing it his way. But as the count stands Right now...he has a less than 50% approval rating
*CRAAAAAASASSSSHHHHHHH*
landlord :hey hey whos there ?! whos that !? *click* *gets a baseball bat in hand*
*smaaash*
burglar : aaaah oooooh my head aaaah..
court : (to landlord) you shouldnt hit the burglar with a baseball bat. you cant defend yourself in your own house.
this is the summary of the situation we are having here.
Monterus wrote:
IMHOcorrect answer is to enforce zoning rights on homes absorbed by an expanding city. They should have 24 hours to recieve zoning rights or move their home. Residents of these homes should not be recognized by the city hall term until they have zoning rights. This would still permit the siege, however would offer some protection to the growing city. I could even see this only being enforced through growth cycle 3 so beyond, squatters would become defacto residents.
Wow Monterus...this is like the most Dictatorly thing youve said yet. so basically you want to say No one is allowed in our city unless our mayor approves of them. Its my city and unless I know you and know you will vote for me you cant live anywhere near here. Might as well just leave the /privacy thing up...its the same...
Monterus,
I had a fully commented post that crashed, but let me summarize:
You need to produce facts, not accusations against my character. For anybody to go as low as you have to slander my name just shows what kind of people GotZ are in and out of game.
I am embarrased to even dignify your lies with a response.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Griefing? No...so that is why the / command will be removed. Seiging? yes CoC are the opressors there are more people currently in the city that wish to oust him as mayor, but he wishes to make it so they cannot. By using the / command or any of the other myriad of suggestions made. Maybe his off server contacts will come through for him and then he'll have some nice dummy votes to swing it his way. But as the count stands Right now...he has a less than 50% approval rating
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
that might be so, in any case mayor shouldnt be able to bar already present citizens from voting.
however this in no case can justify the SIEGER's position for a 'holy and glorious rightfully democratic' TAKEOVER. aint so ?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow Monterus...this is like the most Dictatorly thing youve said yet. so basically you want to say No one is allowed in our city unless our mayor approves of them. Its my city and unless I know you and know you will vote for me you cant live anywhere near here. Might as well just leave the /privacy thing up...its the same...-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bub, mayor is the REPRESENTATIVE of the CITIZENS in the city, and if the citizens dont like his ousting you, theyll replace him with someone who will get you in, and you will be able to get in.
didnt it ever come to you that the citizens might in any case be NOT wanting you inside ?
the present citizens wanted to expand. the present citizens DID NOT want any other people in the city. the siegers FORCED the present citizens to get them in, or NOT to expand.
there is no democracy or equity in siegeing. it is just what barbarians did to roman empire. CONQUEST.
This Ho stuff had better stop, how can a group of supposed adults fabricate such lies. Provide the screenshots or appologize.
I hope my Rebel brothers are reading this lie and the THOUSANDS of them take action.
j/k btw, Jaspor is no Hitler (is he even the mayor Im getting them mixed up) but he is the dictator of his city until he let us in the door.
Iebas, as the representative of your guild you are responsible for their behavior. That was the intent of that comment. My apologies if you misunderstood or I was not clear...in re-reading I see that I was notconciseenough in my verbage. HOWEVER, the issue remains. We both know it happened. My guild has a very clear code of conduct and this is not permitted. Are you telling me that your does NOT? The verbal harassment stops or CSRs will be contacted. My wife is much less tolerant of this than anyone else I know and she WILL file a complaint if it happens again. Once more, you have my apologies for a poorly worded statement, Not everyone is always as clear as they would like.
As far as a dictatorly post, thank you, I am Imperial after all.
But no, that is not the case. Automatic residence completely castrates the zoningrights command and you know it and are exploiting that function. Is the an actual game exploit? I don't know, perhaps the Devs would like to look at the events thus far and reconsider their choices. And unless you are a correspondant, please don't presume to tell me it is.