Doctor Archive

With some older resources I had I made a schem for some LS's with 175 power, now I know I have heard people have made 177's.

Ewaene Yta

Flurry

Please, I also need the experimental effectiveness percentage with your power number(s). Stating that LS's can get to 177 is all fine and grand, but it really gets me no closer to determining the range of LS's unless I have the experimental effectiveness percentage that goes along with 177 power.

Thanks.

they were experimented to 84%

84% at 175? or at 177?

ABEC: 25 Charges / 25 Power
I believe this is too low I project 30/30 not 25/25. I have seen 22-23 charges and 23 power and there no near max, at least 2-3 boxes of expt. left.

ACRDM: 75 Power
Concur did some projections based on the % of several. Made some 68 power ones, 1 box left in expt.

ASDS: 75 Power
Concur did some projections based on the % of several. Made some 71 power ones, 1 box left in expt.

ALS: 200 Power
Concur did some projections based on the % of several. Made some 181, 2 boxes left in expt.

I promise 25/25 is the max for ABECs...

I'm using 985oq/ut fiberplast and 996oq wheat to hit 98% on charges, which is 24. Of course, 95% is also 24 charges...

The power ranges are linear -- I'll start tracking data for you, but max power * X% will yield the power value in question, to +/- 0.75 units or so (due to rounding or cutting off decimals).

Anybody? I've gotten only about 5 replies and, as of yet, no hard data. Do you not care about this stuff? Or are you just waiting for someone else to do it for you?

Here's some data on standard components that I gathered a couple weeks ago:

BEC Power (% experimented/resulting power)

3 1
10 1
18 2
24 3
31 1
38 4
45 5
52 5
59 6
73 7

BEC charges

2 1
9 1
16 2
27 3
34 3
41 4
48 5
62 6
69 7
76 7

LS Power

8 9
22 17
36 24
39 26
24 18
38 26
52 33
66 41
80 49
86 52

CDRM Power

3 1
10 2
17 4
21 5
28 6
35 7
49 10
65 13
72 14
79 16

Here are the ranges based on a "bets fit" line:

BEC power 0 - 10

BEC charges 0 - 10

LS power 5 - 60

CDRM Power 0 - 20

There is actually a minimum of 1 on the stats, but the data indicates a minimum of 0 based on testing in the center of the experimental range. I suspect that the primary formula starts at 0, and a minimum of 1 is applied if necessary.

---

Happymob wrote:

BEC Power (% experimented/resulting power)

3 1
10 1
18 2
24 3
31 1
38 4
45 5
52 5
59 6
73 7

---

Thank you! That's exactly the sort of information I need to put this together. I only have one question - I assume this is a typo (I've highlighted it in yellow). What is that supposed to be? Should that be 3 power or 4?

---

mcglonec wrote:

Thank you! That's exactly the sort of information I need to put this together. I only have one question - I assume this is a typo (I've highlighted it in yellow). What is that supposed to be? Should that be 3 power or 4?

---

Probably 3, but the typo is in my spreadsheet as well, so it's probably best to toss out that data point.

I did some additional testing and it looks like it should be a 3. In fact, I know it is as I hit 31% on the head during my test.

I can still use some more data on the basic subcomponents, but I really need data for the advanced subcomponents, folks. I just don't have the resources to make high quality advanced subcomponents so, without your help, this just isn't going to get done.

Give me some time, but hopefully I can do some of these this weekend.