Doctor Archive

with a 908 pack im buffing for 2247 thats with bio cloths and a 110 droid, i can live with that

insulting us isn't going to get anything changed ... and you should have been carrying around bivoli since the chef revamp .... I noticed a 400 point increase on average keeping track of buffs for about 2 weeks using and not using bivoli .... and as far as the newb doc comment goes ... just because some of us jumped on board a server fairly recently (ie november when the euro servers went up) doesn't mean we're all newb docs .... I for one am annoyed with the whole situation not because of the buff changes but rather the experiment changes using the same ingrediants ( new subcomponents ) about 25 power higher , 2-3 charges more and 2000 seconds longer ... I ceased to take into consideration all those on TC complaining on the experimentation changes that they're resources prolly weren't as good as mine (as I've heard many complain about howbad resources on TC are ....) and from what I understand the better the resources you have, the better the improvements will be .... so now i'm struggling to get as many schems made tonight as i can .... before they get reverted tommorow ...

Message Edited by Nema0879 on 03-17-2004 12:56 AM

Fix is fine for me, sure I won't be hitting 3k + but then again I won't be getting aggrivated over hitting 900 on my best packs whilst those slightly less better are reaching 3000.

What we need is a Doctor's union, so we can fix our prices depending onthe base stat of the buff

Been a doc for a few months, been getting the best resources... and I love the change. For two people who told me that my buffs are the best there were four that never got a buff above 2500, or even 2000 sometimes. With 885 packs I was still getting 1100 buffs regularly... No brainer too me. I however agree that there should be a less linear formula above a point.

---

Tiberian74 wrote:

i also believe it will help people who actually like being a doc and try to get the best resources they can because now the dodgy doc in the corner selling cheap buffs with 650 - 700 packs cannot blame the random factor for the poor results.

---

But the difference between an 1800 buff and a 2500 buff is really not significant for most PvE players. The dodgy doc will do just fine for most people ... The difference between "being buffed" and having the highest buffs is not significant enough to pay double the price, and I think people will soon learn this. The only players who really need the highest buffs are PvPers and those fighting Krayts/Nightsisters etc, which is a minority of customers.

The difference betwen 1800 and 2200 may be more apparent after the combat changes.

They aren't just making up the numbers.

Even now that difference is the line between a stim and a res pack.

-T

Well I'm having no trouble using up my old September 2003 buffpacks (695s) at 6k per buff set in the cities. Nobody really cares yet, they just want a buff. Saving my good ones for PvP raids (I'm in a PvP-focused guild).

I personally like the new buffing system. There is nothing worse than wanting to kill some nightsister mobs and getting a 900 buff on action. The overwrite feature is king too.

I was nerfed twice today...one for my smuggler char and one for my doctor char /sigh

I love the new changes. People that think they had higher averages before are probably basing that on selective memory.

Say it with me people, "It's not a freaking NERF, it is a fix to one of the top doctor issues."

I buff for 2190 without food, it's fine by me... People who complain will get no buffs I think though, already got one today telling me how he got better buffs somewhere else for the same price...