Bounty Hunter Archive

Thread: Cloak/Exploit questions? (Tanks will I get in trouble for this?)

Mirthain
Sat Jul 30, 2005 4:36 pm
#14

And since the cloak is a mind trick, it doesn't work on droids.


-Talen-


Atlas120
Sat Jul 30, 2005 5:51 pm
#15

Not an exploit... And any jedi that goes cloaked when not in a house or in the middle of a PA city (where no mobs are close enough to bring an AOE option) deserves to die... Bomb droid? Don't think it's an exploit.. but have never seen any of these do a whole lot of damage...



00000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000
Tyrat-Exile
00000000000000000000000000-Third Wookiee King
00000000000000000000000000-Haxi-Exile
00000000000000000000000000-The King's alt and lacky
FreyFrey sigs inc *do not steal*

IIA_Agent
Sat Jul 30, 2005 6:08 pm
#16


An exploit is using a bug ingame to gain an advantage.


The Developers made cloak so it is untargetable, and unattackable. Therefore you would have reason to believe that the devs feel a cloaked Jedi should not be able to be attacked.


This Makes it clear that Attacking a Jedi while cloaked is an exploit. Due to the fact that the droid can still target a player, and attack a player that is not supposed to be attacked.


Training Mobs is considered harrasment based on the community standards, so draging mobs to a Jedi to be used to launch an area attack would be harrasment, and an exploit.



My post is based on Fact from the SOE terms of service agreement, from the descriptions of the powers, and the changes the devs made to the power. It is also based on the Communtity standards set forth by SOE dealing with Harrasment or other players.


Just because you feel something is not an exploit does not mean that it is not one.


SOE has given us tools in the form of TOS/community standards, to be able to judge if something is or is not an exploit.


Clear this is since it is a bug in the game, that is not intended, and is being used to gain an advantage over another player.





Old School Master Jedi Killer
Orthell
Sat Jul 30, 2005 6:25 pm
#17

The bomb droid I think is legit. The agroing one can have a two sided argument.

We know that targeting a cloaked Jedi was a bug and fixed. Shooting area attack at a crowd near a Jedi I think should be considered legit, but one side might say you shouldn't be able to hit them like that.

My take (from a Jedi) is if it was a random chance of hitting the Jedi, that would end the argument and be fair, if anyone thinks it's unfair.

However, a Jedi DUMB enough to stand there cloaked while you do that is asking for it. Jedi shouldn't be AFK in open. I always /logo or go afk somewhere safe when nature calls.







(gnn[[[[[[[[[[]nnnWX9ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg)
Orthell Tersk - Elder Jedi
Dropoff and pickup vendor @ Dantooine, Cape Arissi -987 4548--- Hey, who broke my lightsaber???
Eskie
Sat Jul 30, 2005 6:39 pm
#18



IIA_Agent wrote:

An exploit is using a bug ingame to gain an advantage.

The Developers made cloak so it is untargetable, and unattackable. Therefore you would have reason to believe that the devs feel a cloaked Jedi should not be able to be attacked.

This Makes it clear that Attacking a Jedi while cloaked is an exploit. Due to the fact that the droid can still target a player, and attack a player that is not supposed to be attacked.

Training Mobs is considered harrasment based on the community standards, so draging mobs to a Jedi to be used to launch an area attack would be harrasment, and an exploit.

My post is based on Fact from the SOE terms of service agreement, from the descriptions of the powers, and the changes the devs made to the power. It is also based on the Communtity standards set forth by SOE dealing with Harrasment or other players.

Just because you feel something is not an exploit does not mean that it is not one.

SOE has given us tools in the form of TOS/community standards, to be able to judge if something is or is not an exploit.

Clear this is since it is a bug in the game, that is not intended, and is being used to gain an advantage over another player.





Actually, the devs said a cloaked Jedi should not be targetable. They did not say anything about not being attackable, however. The "not targetable" part automatically voids any single-target attacks since you are not supposed to see the Jedi. Area attacks on the other hand are just fired blindly into the general direction of a crowd of enemies and hit everything in the area - the one firing the shots does only aim at a general area. I would say area attacks on nearby mobs hurting the cloaked Jedi are fine.

Training is defined as drawing critters onto another player in order to have them attack said player. Just pulling some mobs next to a player is not training. Not an exploit either in my opinion.

Concerning the bomb droid I would only question how he was positioned next to a cloaked Jedi. Was it by "Follow Target"? Exploit since you dont know "Target" is there. Was it by just placing it on the ground where the seeker marked a waypoint, running away and detonating it on the waypoint? Fair game.

But the original poster asked if there were any official dev statements on those matters. There were no official statements so far.



Eskona Runningstar
12pt Master Doctor - Master Riflewoman
Light Jedi Padawan
-ERI- medical supplies CLOSED

Left to explore new galaxies far, far away
after this galaxy had been enhanced far too much for her taste
Leatherneck_of_Alderaan
Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:43 pm
#19






Actairr wrote:
I just want to know if anything official was said by some one important (a dev or other SOE employee about whether the following are exploits or not:

A) Using bomb droids to get around cloak

or

B) Using an area attack on npc/mobs to get around cloak

Message Edited by Actairr on 07-30-2005 06:52 AM





As a VERY avid Cloaker, if you DARE to use those tactics on me....






....I'll tell you good fight, no matter who wins. Both are fine, IMO. The only thing that's close to an exploit is the bombdroid thing. But truthfully, even IF it's an exploit, it's an extremely minor one. I won't be complaining if someone tries that on me and I lose.




Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
Mirthain
Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:46 pm
#20

Actually, using the /follow name is essentially the same thing that you are doing with the seeker. And since you were brought to the WP by another droid, you did know the general area that the target is at.


I do agree that med attacks on a target (/infect name) is against the spirit of the cloak. But utilizing droids sensors as a spoof breaker isn't.


And firing into a mob for the chance to hit a cloaked jedi isn't technically training. You are pulling the mob onto you, not pulling the mob to them. The intent is that you aren't trying to get the mob to attack, you are actually doing something to break the cloak so you can attack them.


I know that could be construed differently, but it obviously the dev's intent that AoE attacks damage Cloaked players after the target fix, so I seriously doubt that is an exploit. Of course, depending on the planet, it could be pretty dangerous to be firing all over the place just to an AoE hit. Heheh.


-Talen-



Joker9125
Sat Jul 30, 2005 10:16 pm
#21






IIA_Agent wrote:


An exploit is using a bug ingame to gain an advantage.


The Developers made cloak so it is untargetable, and unattackable. Therefore you would have reason to believe that the devs feel a cloaked Jedi should not be able to be attacked.


This Makes it clear that Attacking a Jedi while cloaked is an exploit. Due to the fact that the droid can still target a player, and attack a player that is not supposed to be attacked.


Training Mobs is considered harrasment based on the community standards, so draging mobs to a Jedi to be used to launch an area attack would be harrasment, and an exploit.



My post is based on Fact from the SOE terms of service agreement, from the descriptions of the powers, and the changes the devs made to the power. It is also based on the Communtity standards set forth by SOE dealing with Harrasment or other players.


Just because you feel something is not an exploit does not mean that it is not one.


SOE has given us tools in the form of TOS/community standards, to be able to judge if something is or is not an exploit.


Clear this is since it is a bug in the game, that is not intended, and is being used to gain an advantage over another player.








I hate that Jedi are everywhere and the fact that several (I AM NOT SAYING ALL JEDI ARE LIKE THIS SO DONT EVEN BEGIN TO SAY I AM) are little kids who have no life, access to mommys credit cards and think that because they have a glowstick should make them invincible as much as anyone, however I have to agree with this person here.


Many Jedi do not think that /offeride is an exploit because it makes sense that you should be able to hop in a car and escape if someone is chasing you nor do many of them think that running into buildings to avoid attack is either. In both cases I agree that it makes sense however it is clearly not intended since the Jedi/BH is supposed to be one on one with NO outside interference whatsoever which makes /offerride obviously unintended because someone elseis interfeering by driving the vehicleand since the BH tef prevents a BH from entering a buildingand when it lands does the same to Jedi that makes peace macros clearly unintended as well. This means that using the same logic beinging a mob over to a Jedi to use an area attack violates the intent of a 1 on 1 fight because you are using an outside source to gain an advantage over your opponent and since cloak makes them unattackable without the help of an outside source (whichI alreaded stated goes against the devs intentions)it is clear that using an AOE attack is not intended. Which would make the intentional use of it an exploit. Even though it makes sense that the Jedi is still there and should be attackable in this way.


However since I am not fimillar with using bomb droids to attack them (I've never used them personally in my hunts) I cant really say either way on that one.



http://forums.station.sony.com/swg/board/message?board.id=creature_handler&message.id=218063">Clicky To My Sticky

"If nothing else, I've got time to explore some of the other games my friends are playing. It could easily be argued that the NGE is the best thing ever to happen to guild wars" - Me

Velitham MCH
Jadeddy
Sun Jul 31, 2005 1:36 am
#22

Id say neither is an exploit.Personally I wish we could have a lil fps, aim about a foot or 2 above my droids dome and blast away ^_^. How about a droid that disables cloak? Use it like a bomb droid, send it over then blow it up, send chaff flying, chaff gets stuck on jedi, see chaff, shoot at chaff, hit jedi. Makes sence, no? Probobly not. But no exploit to blow up a bomb or fire blindly.



This is5percent luck,twenty percent skill,fifty percent concentrated power of will, twenty percent pleasure,5percent pain: A hundred percent reason to remember the name:


-Jaded-

Yoshiyuki
Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:13 am
#23






lbfoofoo wrote:

If the jedi is whining cuz the bomb droid hurt him while he was cloaked then he is just a whiny baby who can't believe he's not invincible. Using bomb droids on cloaked jedi is perfectly legit. Not sure how you would use a mob against a cloaked jedi though






He's not a jedi he's a ebaydi.
Yoshiyuki
Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:16 am
#24






maRRsTu wrote:
neither of which are exploits, cloak is not suppose to be invinsability on. AOE hit everything in the area. you should not be able to /targ the person but your BH droid gives you the loacation so its fine.





Yea but droids don't work on kashyyk now do they. Maybe a R2 unit with a bounty sniffer that is not effected by kashyyk is in order
GaZZacK
Sun Jul 31, 2005 5:29 am
#25

I don't think a bomb droid (one time use) can kill a decent level jedi in one hit...and since you can heal/activate defenses while cloaked, its not that big of a deal imo.



Gazz Zack - Jedi
Malachii Darkstar - Pikedood
Ha'leh Norvin - Dancer
Actairr
Sun Jul 31, 2005 6:10 am
#26



GaZZacK wrote:
I don't think a bomb droid (one time use) can kill a decent level jedi in one hit...and since you can heal/activate defenses while cloaked, its not that big of a deal imo.




I don't use this on jedi that are at the computer, only on AFK cloaked jedi. I sent a PM to the jedi and BH correspondents and will post what they say here when I get answers. Honestly though unless a dev states that this IS indeed an exploit I will use it and there should be nothing bad that can be done to me for using it since no one has said that it is an exploit. Being able to target a cloaked jedi was a bug and it got fixed, I just think if this was a bug then it would have been fixed too. But who knows.
Page 2 of 3